Gone Home | Riot Grrrl | Audre Lorde

Part One: Gone Home | Riot Grrrl | Audre Lorde

So this week I learned I’m not much of a gamer. I downloaded and attempted to play Gone Home much to the protests of my apparently ancient Macbook and in spite of my inability to swiftly and competently learn how to literally move about (those keys are awkward, and I moved so slooooow!) and operate a video game (What am I doing? Where am I going? Am I doing this right?).

While I was able to pick up on some of the themes on my own, I’ll admit I had to turn to the internet to see how the game ended and uncover all the Greenbriar family secrets. I called it quits after about an hour and a half — never unlocking the basement or other hidden rooms and definitely not gaining entry into the attic. 

What I was able to discover and understand, was that each person who lived in the house (Sam, Janice, Terry) was wrestling with change, experiencing internal conflicts, and had uncertainty about the world around them. 

By exploring artifacts throughout the house, each player’s stories were revealed.

Sam, a teenager who just moved to a new house and started a new school, was beginning to develop new interests in movies, music, art, and pop culture, thanks in part to a new friend named Lonnie. Slowly we learn that Lonnie becomes much more than a friend and is actually romantically involved with Sam.

Mother Janice, unhappy with her marriage, struggles to find ways to connect with her husband. She fills her calendar with couples activities, reads self-help, and turns to an old friend for advice. We also learn this discontent in her marriage may be leading to feelings toward a work colleague. The father, Terry, is a published writer going through a writing slump and is currently (and not so well) writing technology reviews. While the letter Katie found in her father’s desk from his dead uncle Oscar roused suspicions and gave me pause about their relationship (I had a hunch something indecent happened), I was unable to substantiate anything because I wasn’t able to make it far enough into the game (apparently the clues to that storyline live in the basement). Luckily for me, and courtesy of other gamers, there’s lots of speculation about the father’s past and possible sexual abuse at the hands of the uncle to be found on the web. 

I provide this background so that the connections I make to works and themes we’ve explored in the class are more clear. 

Gender Readings | Riot Grrrl | Audre Lorde

Most notably, Sam chooses to express her changing personality through the embrace of the 1990s Riot Grrrl movement, which used music and art to challenge social norms about gender roles, identity, beauty, and sexuality. Throughout the house, you find mix tapes featuring 90s bands like Bikini Kill, Bratmobile, Heavens to Betsy, and see posters and magazines featuring artists like Black Francis, Lisa Loeb, Kurt Cobain, and others.

You find out that Sam’s parents feel like they don’t understand her anymore and you discover evidence of her changing — her storytelling (in her long-running story, the first mate is written first as male than female), her appearance (red hair dye in the bathroom), her friends (Daniel is a “weirdo”), her interests (playing video games with Daniel). 

Authors Meg-John Barker and Julia Scheele tell us in Queer: A Graphic History that we “Queer things when we resist ‘regimes of normal’: The ‘normative’ ideals of aspiring to be normal in identity, behaviour, appearance, relationships, etc.” (13). Not only was Sam affirming her sexuality, but she was also queering her place in the world and exploring her identity on multiple fronts. 

These changes are a reflection of what Catherine Valentine writes about in “The Prism of Gender.” She says, “Research shows that the behavior of people, no matter who they are, depends on time and place, context and situation — not on fixed sex/gender/sexuality differences” (5). The time, place, and situation Sam was placed in and created shaped and formed her behavior. 

I think Sam would very much identify with something Ijeoma Olua said in “So You Want to Talk About Race.” Olua spoke about experiencing an internal shift in thought and action — something inside her changed and that change meant she could no longer quiet her inner voice and remain silent about slights and injustices. She said, “I had started to see myself, and once you start to see yourself, you cannot pretend anymore.” Through Lonnie, Sam began to see herself and that truth then also poured into the many aspects of her life. 

This speaking your personal truth, regardless of discomfort or even consequence, is what Audre Lorde writes about in “The Transformation of Silence into Language and Action.” In this essay, Lorde writes: “I have come to believe over and over again that what is most important to me must be spoken, made verbal and shared, even at the risk of having it bruised or misunderstood. That the speaking profits me, beyond any other effect” (40).

I think some of what Lorde writes about can also be applied to the father’s internal struggle. There is speculation on the web that his preoccupation with JFK and 1963 is connected to his possible abuse, that 1963 was the year something happened to him. That these books were a way he was trying to cope and work through his personal issues. In “The Transformation of Silence into Language and Action,” Lorde encourages us to consider all the words we have yet to find all the things we have left unsaid —  “What are the words you do not yet have? What do you need to say? What are the tyrannies you swallow day by day and attempt to make your own, until you will sicken and die of them, still in silence?” (41).

Part Two


Topic Idea #1:

  • Gender and social media use: Does gender influence how and why people use and interact with social media?
    • Explore differences in how male and female-identified users choose and use different social media platforms. 
    • Examine the differences and similarities and see if they tie back to normalized ideas about gender and gender expectations. 
    • Explore whether social media disrupts or reinforces social norms and gender expectations. 
  • Artifacts: Contrast and compare social media accounts of individuals who identify as male/female/nonbinary [Instagram and TikTok might be good visual examples]. Look for and examine first-person accounts of social media experiences from people who identify as male/female/nonbinary through blog posts, song, poetry, articles, etc. 

Topic Idea #2:

  • Gender and social media effects: Does social media use impact people differently based on their gender?
    • Does gender play a role in people’s online experiences — are there negative or positive outcomes based on gender? 
  • Artifacts: Look for and examine first-person accounts of social media experiences from people who identify as male/female/nonbinary through blog posts, songs, poetry, articles, etc.  

Topic Idea #3:

  • The impact of gender roles and expectations on mental health and well-being: How do gender roles and expectations impact mental health?
    • How does the pressure to conform impact one’s mental and emotional health?
    • What role do gender-specific trauma and violence play? 
    • Is access to mental health care impacted by gender?
  • Look for and examine first-person accounts of mental health experiences written by people who identify as male/female/nonbinary through blog posts, songs, poetry, articles, art, etc. 

Different Perspective: Black Feminism

“The Combahee River Collective Statement”

Summary: As Dr. Martin commented in lecture notes, the Combahee River Collective Statement basically outlines and introduces the idea of intersectionality: 

The most general statement of our politics at the present time would be that we are actively committed to struggling against racial, sexual, heterosexual, and class oppression, and see as our particular task the development of integrated analysis and practice based upon the fact that the major systems of oppression are interlocking. The synthesis of these oppressions creates the conditions of our lives. As Black women we see Black feminism as the logical political movement to combat the manifold and simultaneous oppressions that all women of color face.

From The Combahee River Collective Statement

The Collective formed in response to disillusionment with the white, middle-class mainstream feminist movement which they found didn’t adequately concern itself with recognizing the different oppressions women of color faced and who particularly did not want to carry the banner for lesbians. 

While the Black feminist movement the Collective embodied drew from the Black liberation movement, they were critical of the role they played in Black society, saying “We struggle together with Black men against racism, while we also struggle with Black men about sexism.” However, they noted that “Although we are feminists and Lesbians, we feel solidarity with progressive Black men and do not advocate the fractionalization that white women who are separatists demand. Our situation as Black people necessitates that we have solidarity around the fact of race, which white women of course do not need to have with white men unless it is their negative solidarity as racial oppressors.” 

What I found very interesting in this text, is the focus and acknowledgment of the problems in organizing Black feminists. Particularly their awareness and verbalization of the psychological and physical toll of navigating their day-to-day lives, which are filled with micro-and macro-aggressions, while simultaneously trying to do the work to fight and dismantle those systems: 



The major source of difficulty in our political work is that we are not just trying to fight oppression on one front or even two, but instead to address a whole range of oppressions. We do not have racial, sexual, heterosexual, or class privilege to rely upon, nor do we have even the minimal access to resources and power that groups who possess anyone of these types of privilege have.

The psychological toll of being a Black woman and the difficulties this presents in reaching political consciousness and doing political work can never be underestimated. There is a very low value placed upon Black women’s psyches in this society, which is both racist and sexist. As an early group member once said, “We are all damaged people merely by virtue of being Black women.” We are dispossessed psychologically and on every other level, and yet we feel the necessity to struggle to change the condition of all Black women. 

From The Combahee River Collective Statement

Keywords: Black feminism | Intersectionality

“So You Want to Talk About Race”

Summary: Ijeoma Oluo asserts that it’s difficult to talk about race because we have intentionally been “denied the tools we need to talk about it.” She says that race is a system of power that is designed to benefit only some at the expense of others. When oppression is established on differences like skin color, that can be hard to overcome because you can’t change that.

“My blackness is woven into how I dress each morning, what bars I feel comfortable going to, what music I enjoy, what neighborhoods I hang out in.”

– Ijeoma Oluo, “So You Want to Talk About Race”

She says when we talk about racism being ingrained in the system we cannot be obtuse, we cannot be vague, we need to name the systems we’re talking about — economic, cultural, and political. When we break down and identify where oppression lives, it makes it more tangible and manageable — people can choose who to vote for, where to spend their money, what our values are, what constitutes professionalism, what we want our children to be taught, etc. She says “this collection of everyday decisions we make turns into a system of race.” If we don’t question how and why we make the choices we do, the systems perpetuate with “a hefty payout for a very select few.” By not questioning race and racial oppression, we only continue to serve those who are currently in power. 

“These are very scary times for a lot of people who are just now realizing that America is not and has never been the melting pot utopia that their parents and teachers told them it was. These are very scary times for those who are just now realizing how justifiably hurt, angry, and terrified so many people of color have been all along. These are very stressful times for people of color who have been fighting and yelling and trying to protect themselves from a world that doesn’t care to suddenly be asked by those who’ve ignored them for so long, what has been happening your entire life?”

– Iljeoma Oluo, “So You Want to Talk About Race”

This part of her discussion really resonated with me: Oluo says we are taught that racists use racial slurs and burn crosses. But that’s not the whole of racism. Racism is much more insidious. She tells us: “in a system that only requires that you do nothing in order to perpetuate itself, your intentions don’t mean squat.” To not be a racist you have to stop participating in and propping up systems that are racist and racially oppressive. You have to reconsider what those things actually look like. Then you have to act. 

She also says that talking about race is hard because people come to the table with “personal goals” and too often these goals result in white and Black people having  “two completely different conversations that will never meet.” 

Importantly, Oluo points out that the repercussions of talking about race are much greater for people of color. That when Black people actually sit at the table to discuss race, it is an overwhelmingly generous act. 

Keywords: Race | Systemic Racism | Dialogue |

“Age, Race, Class, and Sex: Women Redefining Difference”

Summary: Talks about how we can and must embrace differences to create social change. 

Audre Lorde begins this writing by pointing out that in our society, we put the burden on oppressed people or people who white people have deemed different, to teach the oppressors about their mistakes and to educate them about the oppressed’s humanity. She writes: “Black and Third World people are expected to educate white people as to our humanity. Women are expected to educate men. Lesbians and gay men are expected to educate the heterosexual world” (p. 115). This, she says, drains the energy of those doing the educating and detracts from their ability to focus on “redefining ourselves and devising realistic scenarios for altering the present and constructing the future” (p. 115). It is also a waste of energy to pretend ”differences are insurmountable barriers, or that they do not exist at all,” when that energy could be spent “recognizing and exploring” differences” (p. 115). 

Lorde argues that rejecting difference is a requirement in a profit economy where someone/ some group has to be marginalized. She says this system programs us to “respond to human differences with fear and loathing.” Similarly to what Ijeoma Oluo offered, she says we are not given the tools to look at this system critically. In fact, she says we are intentionally confused in the “service of separation” (p. 115). 

“In a society where the good is defined in terms of profit rather than in terms of human need, there must always be some group of people who, through systematized oppression, can be made to feel surplus, to occupy the place of the dehumanized inferior. Within this society, that group is made up of Black and Third World people, working-class people, older people, and women” (p. 114).

Audre Lorde, “Age, Race, Class, and Sex: Women Redefining Difference”

Lorde tells us that “Refusing to recognize difference makes it impossible to see the different problems and pitfalls facing us as women” (p. 118). She says that only in recognizing our differences can we bring about change and we must recognize that in being different we are still equal: “As women, we must root out internalized patterns of oppression within ourselves if we are to move beyond the most superficial aspects of social change. Now we must recognize differences among women who are our equals, neither inferior nor superior, and devise ways to use each others’ difference to enrich our visions and our joint struggles” (p 122). 

Keywords: Intersectionality | Age | Race | Class | Sex | Black Feminism


Tying Things Together

I think the women would all agree that being a Black woman, and Black woman feminist, navigating the world via racist and oppressive systems is exhausting and tiring work.

I believe they would all agree that the burden should not be on them to educate white people about all the systemic ways they are oppressed.

I think they would all agree there is work to be done in their communities as well as in broader society.

And I think they all agree that traditional feminism doesn’t represent their lived experiences.


Discussing Audre Lorde & Tupac Shakur

It’s possible that Audre Lorde heard Tupac Shakur’s song “Keep Ya Head Up,” on the radio, was caught off guard by the lyrics, and then happily turned the sound up.

Hearing a Black man acknowledge the treatment of Black women, something she wrote about in 1980’s “Age, Race, Class, and Sex: Women Redefining Difference.” Had to be affirming.

In “Age, Race, Class, and Sex,” Lorde had a lot to say about Black women’s status in the Black community:

Because of the continuous battle against racial erasure that Black women and Black men share, some Black women still refuse to recognize that we are also oppressed as women, and that sexual hostility against Black women is practiced not only by the white racist society, but implemented within our Black communities as well. It is a disease striking the heart of Black by racism and the pressures of powerlessness, violence against Black women and children often becomes a standard within our communities, one by which manliness can be measured. But these woman-hating acts are rarely discussed as crimes against Black women.

Audre Lorde

And, at least in this song’s lyrics, Tupac Shakur agrees:

I give a holler to my sisters on welfare
Tupac cares, if don’t nobody else care
And uh, I know they like to beat ya down a lot
When you come around the block, brothas clown a lot
But please don’t cry, dry your eyes, never let up
Forgive but don’t forget, girl, keep your head up
And when he tells you you ain’t nuttin’ don’t believe him
And if he can’t learn to love you, you should leave him
‘Cause sista you don’t need him
And I ain’t tryin’ to gas ya up, I just call ’em how I see ’em (you don’t need him)
You know me makes me unhappy? (What’s that?)
When brothas make babies
And leave a young mother to be a pappy (oh, yeah, yeah, yeah)
And since we all came from a woman
Got our name from a woman and our game from a woman (yeah, yeah)
I wonder why we take from our women
Why we rape our women, do we hate our women? (Why? Why?)
I think it’s time to kill for our women (why? Why? Why? Why?)
Time to heal our women, be real to our women
And if we don’t we’ll have a race of babies
That will hate the ladies, that make the babies (oh, yeah, baby)

“Keep Ya Head Up” by Tupac Shakur

I think it’s important to note, like the women of the Combahee River Collective, that she identifies Black men as allies. But to bring about change, she has done the hard work of scrutinizing details of Black women’s lives to identify points of conflict.

What are the particular details within each of our lives that can be scrutinized and altered to help bring about change? (p. 122).

Audre Lorde “Age, Race, Class, and Sex: Women Redefining Difference”

Question

In her discussion, Ijeoma Oluo encourages others to take ownership of their education when it comes to issue of race and oppression. She specifically offers up Google as a research tool.

My question is: When it comes to race or gender, what have you Googled? If you have relied on other resources, what are they?

I’ll go first: I have Googled to define terms like intersectionality, identity politics, first-and second-wave feminism, and I’ve Googled for additional background onthe majority of the authors we’ve read. What I’d like to learn more about (really to be armed with specific examples) is how racism and oppression are built into our social and political systems.

Reconceptualizing Notions of Gender & Feminism

Summary of Readings

In “The Prism of Gender,” Catherine Valentine challenges Western culture’s simple notions of sex, gender, and sexuality and argues that social science research shows they are actually highly complex and evolving. She eschews the Western idea of 2/2/2 or “pink and blue syndrome” — that there are only two sexes (male and female), two genders (masculine and feminine), and two sexualities (heterosexual and homosexual) (p. 3–4). 

In reality, she says that people’s beliefs about gender conflict with how people really behave. 

“Our real behavior is far more flexible, adaptable, and malleable than our beliefs would have it. To put it another way, contrary to the stereotypes of masculinity and femininity, there are no gender certainties or absolutes. Real people behave in feminine, masculine, and nongendered ways…” (p. 3).

She asserts that sex “is not a clear-cut matter of DNA, chromosomes, external genitalia and the like,” and that gender is “built into the larger world we inhabit in the United States, including its institutions, images, symbols, organizations, and material objects,” and that sexuality, like gender, is socially constructed and doesn’t fit into the “binary and oppositional sex and gender template” (p. 5, 7).


Reading Two: “Theorizing Difference from Multiracial Feminism” by Maxine Baca Zinn & Bonnie Thornton Dill, 2000

In “Theorizing Difference from Multiracial Feminism” authors Maxine Baca Zinn and Bonnie Thornton Dill examine the importance of race in understanding the social construction of gender by using a conceptual framework they call “multiracial feminism”(p. 321). 

They say that multiracial feminism “encompasses several emergent perspectives: AA, Latinas, Asian Americans, and Native Americans women whose analyses are shaped by their unique perspectives as ‘outsiders within’ — marginal intellectuals whose social locations provide them with a particular perspective on self and society” (p. 324).

The authors go on to explain that multiracial feminism grew out of socialist feminist thinking and race and ethnic studies (p. 325).

Multiracial feminism asks that women’s studies be more inclusive and consider race, class, location, and other differences so that we can “grapple with core feminist issues about how genders are socially constructed and constructed differently” (p. 39).

“The model of womanhood that feminist social science once held as “universal” is also a product of race and class” (p. 329)


How the Readings Connect

All authors agree that gender is pervasive and shapes almost every aspect of our lives. The authors also agree that gender is a construct, meaning it can vary over time and from society to society. Where Valentine helps us build a foundational understanding of sex, gender, and sexuality, Baca Zinn and Thornton Dill apply another layer and ask us to consider the intersection of race, place, and gender and how that view (multiracial feminism) can contribute to a more universal theory of feminism.

The Replacements’ song “Androgynous” describes a couple who defies traditional gender roles. The song says while they may be laughed at in the moment, one day their perceived differences will be a thing of the past, that it will be normal. It reinforces Valentine’s assertions that gender is malleable and societal definitions/expectations of gender evolve.


My Key Thoughts & Takeaways

First, I appreciated Valentine’s description of Western beliefs regarding sex, gender, and sexuality. I also appreciated her explanation of how modern research is challenging these notions. I think “The Prism of Gender” was a solid introductory read. 

However, one aspect of “Theorizing Difference from Multiracial Feminism” really stood out to me. On pages 326–327, the authors list the distinguishing features of multiracial feminism. On page 328 they write about “three specific guiding principles of inclusive feminist theory: ‘building complex analyses, avoiding erasure, specifying location.” They go on to say that “In the last decade, the opening up of academic feminism has focused attention on social location in the production of knowledge” (p. 328).

It’s the mention of place that caught my attention. In the spring of 2022, I took a Special Topics in History and Geography course called The Queer South. The goal of the class was to question fixed notions about place and identity and to question historical assumptions about where people belong. One important aspect of the class was to consider who historically has been doing the storytelling. I think that’s what Maxine Baca Zinn and Bonnie Thornton Dill are asking us to do. They are asking that we question our traditional understanding of women and gender — even our feminist understanding of women and gender — by asking who has been doing the “telling” and to consider if all people, places, and identities have been included and are represented. They are asking that we reconceptualize our notions of gender and feminism by being more inclusive. 


Question for Consideration

Pick and choose as you’d like:

  1. Have you been able to connect any of what we have read so far to a personal or academic experience? If yes, what? If not, why do you think that is? 
  2. What fascinates or puzzles you most about defining or redefining sex, gender, or sexuality?

Keywords

Sex | Gender | Sexuality | Feminism